| Carnegie/Greenaway
- not your usual book award |
| |
As
the snow fell on the idyllic setting of the Pastoral Centre I felt
a wave of expectation flow through me. This was my first Carnegie/Greenaway
day, and although many people had told me what to expect I still
wasn't quite sure how the day would pan out.
|
|
As I walked
around the building, the halls were bulging with the anticipation
of the eager participants
persuading others, and maybe themselves, what their favourites were
and why they wanted them to win. As I stood muted behind a group
of enthusiastic public library staff a niggling thought started
to pervade my mind. Just as quickly as it came, though, it was pushed
aside by the arrival of the keynote speaker, publisher David Fickling.
|
| Francis
Bacon once said that 'Reading maketh a full man'. I think what David
Fickling suggested echoed this statement, that reading is what is
important to children because it is from reading they gain a better
understanding of the world they live in, and who they are. David believed
that our decisions during the day should therefore be influenced by
what children are excited about. |
| As
I listened to this booming voice reverberating around the hall I briefly
turned around to gauge the interest of the rest of the hall. As I
did, that niggling feeling returned again. I started to wonder why
these people were here. What could bring a group of school and public
librarians, teachers and other people to an event like this? Was it
to meet new people, the chance to catch up with old friends, to get
out of our ordinary surroundings, or even for the food? What I really
wanted to know was what was the purpose of Carnegie/Greenaway day?
|
I
pondered on this thought as we made our way to the rooms with our
groups. The idea of the next two hours was to discuss the 6 shortlisted
Carnegie books and try to evaluate each of them against the set criteria.
Most of the arguments, however, seemed to be defined by the appropriateness
of the books for children. Were we here then to decide what we feel
children should be reading? To make the decision for children as to
what is right for them, and what isn't? |
| As
I sat with my vegetarian sausage, peas and mash (it certainly wasn't
the food they came for), I deliberated over the idea that we were
here to make the decision as to what children should read. Every time
I started to believe it David's voice surfaced in my mind, 'It is
to read that we should encourage.' Did this mean then that reading
was the reason we were here? To get children to read books no matter
what they were? |
| I
took this idea back into the groups where we were due to talk about
the Greenaway titles, again against the set criteria. But again people's
decisions always seemed to return to whether the book was right for
children or not. I began to get frustrated. I don't want to dictate
to children what they should and shouldn't be reading, and I know
they don't want me to either. |
| Whilst
at University I remember reading an essay by Graham Greene in which
he argued 'What do we get nowadays from reading to equal the excitement
and the revelation in those first fourteen years?' As I distracted
myself by looking at the longlist the answer hit me: it is the choice
to read a range of high quality books. |
In
that moment I felt I understood the true meaning of what Carnegie/Greenaway
is all
about. It isn't to decide what children should read, and it isn't
necessarily to get children to read. It is to show them that there
is a wide and varied selection of books, all of which are great quality.
The shortlist reflected this diversity and quality and it was a shame
that some people didn't quite see the reasons behind it. In the jobs
that we do I feel that it is our duty to open doors for children.
Suggest books they may enjoy, and if they don't what have they lost?
A few hours maybe, but what they have gained is a little bit of knowledge
about themselves and who they are. |
| Where
most awards seem to be decided either by the name of the author or
the book that suited boardroom men feel will appeal to children, Carnegie/Greenaway
reflects books that actually matter because of their quality. As the
winners were read out (Carnegie was won by Looking for JJ by Anne
Cassidy with 46 votes, and The Whisperer by Nick Butterworth won the
Greenaway with 28 votes) the result seemed not to matter too much
as I knew that in a sense all the books deserved to win because they
were all books of quality that highlighted the scope of what is being
published. |
|
As I left the
building and made my way to the car I started to believe that this
was going to be the beginning of a wonderful relationship, and that
next year I would be able to influence people to understand what
I now know!!
Adam Lancaster
|